...
Excerpt |
---|
To save on licensing costs, it is sometimes useful to automatically deactivate Jira users who haven't logged in within a certain period, say 6 months. Here we review the options, and provide a ScriptRunner script (source in github) that does the job. |
Table of Contents |
---|
...
- "User has not logged in in X months" is a good start.
How about users that have never logged in? It depends on the age of their user account: if it was created yesterday, but they haven't logged in yet, that's fineleave the account alone; if it was created last year and they haven't logged in, it should be deactivated. So let's also deactivate users whose account was created more than X months ago, AND who have never logged in.
Note icon false Incidentally, if you do a web search for Jira deactivate inactive users' you will see many solutions, like this ScriptRunner script from Adaptavist, that don't handle this edge case (probably because Jira's regular API doesn't expose the 'created' date).
- Jira instances often have multiple directories. It's not possible to deactivate users in LDAP / AD User Directories, so let's add the criteria: users are in the internal (id 1) or Crowd directory (e.g. id 10000).
- Does your Jira have an 'admin' role account on the Internal directory, only used in emergencies when the external user provider (Crowd, LDAP, external Jira) is offline? This shouldn't be automatically deactivated. We must add the rule exclude emergency access accounts.
- Does your Jira contain any 'role' accounts never log in, but are still valid? Perhaps a role account like 'qa' that is assigned issues so that qa@mycompany.com gets notified? If so, we need a exclude role accounts that are used but never log in rule to prevent these role accounts getting deactivated.
...
Our first generic solution is a ScriptRunner for Jira Groovy script. It deactivates users matching rules 1, 2 and 3, namely users in the Internal Directory (1) who have not logged in X months, or who have never logged in to an account created more than X months ago.
Code Block |
---|
...
-include | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
...
|
...
|
...
|
To use this script to automatically deactivate users:
Checkout the script from the github repository to
$JIRAHOME/scripts:
Code Block cd $JIRAHOME/scripts git clone https://github.com/redradishtech/jira-user-deactivator-groovy chgrp -R jira jira-user-deactivator-groovy # Ensure Jira has read access.
If you first want to see what would happen without deactivating anyone, edit
deactivate-inactive-jira-users-nonsql.groovy
and comment out theupdateUser
line:Code Block // Comment out this line to do a dry run: // userService.updateUser(updateUserValidationResult)
Go to the ScriptRunner Jobs tab, e.g. by typing 'gg' then 'Script jobs':
(ScriptRunner Jobs is just a nice UI around Jira Services. In the past one would have created a com.onresolve.jira.groovy.GroovyService Jira Service directly)
- Create a *Custom Scheduled Job:
For User pick an account with the Jira Administrators global permission. You might like to create a dedicated role account ('deactivator') as I have in the screenshot, so that the Job isn't tied to a user account, but this does cost a license slot. - Click Run Now to run the script interactively.
The Logs tab will show what actions the script took (or would have taken if you commented outupdateUser
): - If all looks good, click Add to permanently add the Job.
ScriptRunner Solution with SQL Rules
How about if your rules for who to deactivate need to be more sophisticated than just 'user hasn't logged in in 6 months'?
Consider the use of role accounts, as would exist if you crowdsource the triaging of issues. Role accounts are assigned issues, but never log in. The script above would deactivate role accounts, causing chaos.
So we need to refine our rule for which accounts can be deactivated. For role accounts, we know they are being frequently assigned issues. So we can use the "date of last assign" as another indicator that the account is used.
Figuring out our last login date in code was painful enough: calculating the last assign is a bridge too far. This is a job for SQL, not code.
Our solution is as follows:
- Create a SQL View identifying accounts that can be deactivated. This SQL will take into account when the user last logged in AND when last they were assigned an issue. Any other rules you like can be added to the SQL.
- We modify the Groovy script to read usernames from the SQL View, and deactivate those accounts in code.
Here is Postgres-flavoured SQL, creating a queries.inactive_users
view, of users that can be deactivated (source at https://github.com/redradishtech/jira-user-deactivator-groovy/blob/master/active_users.sql):
Include Code | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Here is a corresponding Groovy script that reads usernames from the view, and deactivates those accounts (source):
Include Code | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
The script should be installed in $JIRAHOME/scripts/jira-user-deactivator-groovy/deactivate_inactive_users.groovy
ande
To put this script into production:
- Save the above script to
$JIRAHOME/scripts/deactivate_inactive_users.groovy
. Make it owned by root but readable by group jira. - Go to the Scriptrunner Script Console and do a test run:
- If all looks good, go to Jira's Services admin page, and add a service of type com.onresolve.jira.groovy.GroovyService
ScriptRunner Solution with SQL Rules
How about if your rules for who to deactivate need to be more sophisticated than just 'user hasn't logged in in 6 months'?
Consider the use of role accounts, as would exist if you Crowdsourcing triage of issues. Role accounts are assigned issues, but never log in. The script above would deactivate role accounts, causing chaos.
So we need to refine our rule for which accounts can be deactivated. For role accounts, we know they are being frequently assigned issues. So we can use the "date of last assign" as another indicator that the account is used.
Figuring out our last login date in code was painful enough: calculating the last assign is a bridge too far. This is a job for SQL, not code.
Our solution is as follows:
- Create a SQL View identifying accounts that can be deactivated. This SQL will take into account when the user last logged in AND when last they were assigned an issue. Any other rules you like can be added to the SQL.
- We modify the Groovy script to read usernames from the SQL View, and deactivate those accounts in code.
Here is Postgres-flavoured SQL, creating a queries.inactive_users
materialized view, of users that can be deactivated:
Code Block |
---|
create schema if not exists queries;
grant all privileges on schema queries to jira;
drop view if exists queries.inactive_users;
CREATE VIEW queries.inactive_users AS
WITH userlogins AS (
SELECT DISTINCT
user_name
, email_address
, cwd_user.created_date
, timestamp with time zone 'epoch'+attribute_value::numeric/1000 * INTERVAL '1 second' AS lastlogin
, cwd_user.directory_id
FROM
cwd_user
JOIN (select * from cwd_directory WHERE directory_type='INTERNAL' and active=1) as cwd_directory ON cwd_user.directory_id = cwd_directory.id
JOIN cwd_membership ON cwd_membership.child_name=cwd_user.lower_user_name
JOIN (
select * from globalpermissionentry WHERE permission IN ('USE', 'ADMINISTER')
) AS globalpermissionentry ON cwd_membership.lower_parent_name=globalpermissionentry.group_id
LEFT JOIN (select * from cwd_user_attributes WHERE attribute_name in ('login.lastLoginMillis')) cwd_user_attributes ON user_id=cwd_user.id
WHERE cwd_user.active=1
)
, lastassigns AS (
SELECT DISTINCT
newvalue AS user_name
, max(created) AS lastassign
FROM changegroup cg
JOIN changeitem ci ON cg.id = ci.groupid
WHERE field='assignee' group by 1
)
SELECT distinct user_name
, email_address
, to_char(created_date, 'YYYY-MM-DD') AS created
, to_char(lastlogin, 'YYYY-MM-DD') AS lastlogin
, to_char(lastassign, 'YYYY-MM-DD') AS lastassign
, (select count(*) from jiraissue where assignee=userlogins.user_name) AS assigneecount
FROM userlogins LEFT JOIN lastassigns USING (user_name)
WHERE ((lastlogin < now() - '6 months'::interval) OR lastlogin is null) AND ((lastassign < now() - '6 months'::interval) OR lastassign is null) ORDER BY lastlogin desc nulls last ;
grant select on queries.inactive_users to jira_ro; |
Here is a corresponding Groovy script that reads usernames from the view, and deactivates those accounts:
Code Block |
---|
/**
* Script that deactivates users who have not logged in within the last X months, based on a SQL query.
* See See https://www.redradishtech.com/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=11796495
*
* Loosely based on Adaptavist's sample at https://www.adaptavist.com/doco/display/SFJ/Automatically+deactivate+inactive+JIRA+users
*
* Instead of trying to figure out which users to deactivate in code, we instead rely on a queries.inactive_users table or view being defined in the Jira database. The SQL can then be as fancy or customized as needed: e.g. we might want to avoid deactivating role accounts which are assigned issues but never log in. The only requirement for our table or view is that a 'user_name' column must exist.
*
* jeff@redradishtech.com, 5/Jun/19
* v1.0
*/
import com.atlassian.jira.user.ApplicationUser
import com.atlassian.jira.user.ApplicationUsers
import com.atlassian.jira.bc.user.UserService
import com.atlassian.crowd.embedded.api.User
import com.atlassian.crowd.embedded.api.UserWithAttributes
import com.atlassian.crowd.embedded.api.CrowdService
import com.atlassian.crowd.embedded.impl.ImmutableUser
/** Deactivate a user.
* @return null on success, or a String error message.
*/
def String deactivate(String user_name) {
CrowdService crowdService = ComponentAccessor.crowdService
def UserWithAttributes user = crowdService.getUserWithAttributes(user_name);
if (!user.active) return "Already inactive";
UserService userService = ComponentAccessor.getComponent(UserService)
ApplicationUser updateUser = ApplicationUsers.from(ImmutableUser.newUser(user).active(false).toUser());
UserService.UpdateUserValidationResult updateUserValidationResult = userService.validateUpdateUser(updateUser);
if (updateUserValidationResult.isValid()) {
// Comment out this line to do a dry run:
//userService.updateUser(updateUserValidationResult)
return null
} else {
return updateUserValidationResult.getErrorCollection().getErrors().entrySet().join(',')
}
}
// https://scriptrunner.adaptavist.com/latest/jira/recipes/misc/connecting-to-databases.html
import com.atlassian.jira.component.ComponentAccessor
import groovy.sql.Sql
import org.ofbiz.core.entity.ConnectionFactory
import org.ofbiz.core.entity.DelegatorInterface
import java.sql.Connection
def delegator = (DelegatorInterface) ComponentAccessor.getComponent(DelegatorInterface)
String helperName = delegator.getGroupHelperName("default")
def sqlStmt = """select * from queries.inactive_users;"""
Connection conn = ConnectionFactory.getConnection(helperName)
Sql sql = new Sql(conn)
log.warn "Beginning inactive user deactivation run"
long count = 0
try {
sql.eachRow(sqlStmt) {
// https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50041526/how-to-read-each-row-in-a-groovy-sql-statement
def errmsg = deactivate(it['user_name'] as String);
if (!errmsg) {
log.warn "Deactivated ${it['user_name']}: ${it}";
count++
} else {
log.error "Failed to deactivate ${it['user_name']}: ${errmsg}";
}
}
}
finally {
sql.close()
}
"${count} inactive users automatically deactivated.\n" |
The script should be installed in $JIRAHOME/scripts/deactivate_inactive_users.groovy
and invoked automatically as a service, as described above.
...
As of , the only relevant plugin is Manage Inactive Users. This free plugin also supports deactivating users in external user bases like Okta and Google Apps.Google Apps.
I am waiting on feedback from the author before passing judgement. The MIU plugin author released new versions that IMO bring the plugin into the realms of usability (previously even the definition of 'inactive' was completely opaque and unmodifiable). For users not keen on Groovy, I suggest giving this plugin a serious tryI am waiting on feedback from the author before passing judgement.
REST Script
Without any plugins, the cleanest solution would be a script utilitizing utilizing Jira's REST interface. The script would search for inactive users with Crowd CQL, then deactivate them. A REST solution would have the advantage of also working on Cloud Jira.
...
Code Block |
---|
# curl --silent --get -u cli:cli http://jira.localhost/rest/usermanagement/1/search -d 'entity-type=user' --data-urlencode 'restriction=active=true and email=jeff@redradishtech.com and createdDate>2013-09-02' --header 'Accept: application/json' | jq . { "expand": "user", "users": [ { "link": { "href": "http://jira.localhost/rest/usermanagement/1/user?username=jturner", "rel": "self" }, "name": "jturner" } ] } |
(create the 'cli' username/password in JIra's "User Server" admin page)
In a perfect world Jira would let us find exactly the users we want to deactivate with Crowd Query Language expression lastLogin > -6m OR (!lastLogin AND createdDate<-6m)
. Sadly 'lastLogin.lastLoginMillis' is considered a 'secondary' property which Crowd CQL doesn't support. Crowd CQL also doesn't support relative dates like '-6m'.
Without decent CQL support, our REST script would need to retrieve every active user, iterate through them, and check each user's last login date / created date. This may be slow and memory-intensive.
Another spanner in the works: Jira only gained a user deactivate REST method in JIRA 8.3+. See
Jira | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Given the potential slowness, and lack of REST support, I didn't pursue this route too far.
Direct database hackery
We have SQL identifying exactly what accounts we want to deactivate. Couldn't we just change the SELECT to an UPDATE that sets active=0
, and do the deactivation directly in the database?
Atlassian apps generally have caching layers that prevent direct database changes from working, but in my experience, Crowd picks up changes to cwd_user
immediately, so this approach could work. The Crowd Query Language (CQL) is presumably implemented with Lucene, and would have stale results. Is this critical?
"name": "jturner"
}
]
} |
(create the 'cli' username/password in JIra's "User Server" admin page)
In a perfect world Jira would let us find exactly the users we want to deactivate with Crowd Query Language expression lastLogin > -6m OR (!lastLogin AND createdDate<-6m)
. Sadly 'lastLogin.lastLoginMillis' is considered a 'secondary' property which Crowd CQL doesn't support. Crowd CQL also doesn't support relative dates like '-6m'.
Without decent CQL support, our REST script would need to retrieve every active user, iterate through them, and check each user's last login date / created date. This may be slow and memory-intensive.
Another spanner in the works: Jira only gained a user deactivate REST method in JIRA 8.3+. See
Jira | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Given the potential slowness, and lack of REST support, I didn't pursue this route too far.
Direct database hackery
We have SQL identifying exactly what accounts we want to deactivate. Couldn't we just change the SELECT to an UPDATE that sets active=0
, and do the deactivation directly in the database?
Atlassian apps generally have caching layers that prevent direct database changes from working, but in my experience, Crowd picks up changes to cwd_user
immediately, so this approach could work. The Crowd Query Language (CQL) is presumably implemented with Lucene, and would have stale results. Is this critical?
I haven't researched this much further, as instances I work with all have ScriptRunner available.
What about Confluence?
There is now a Confluence version of the inactive_users
SQL at https://github.com/redradishtech/jira-user-deactivator-groovy/blob/master/inactive_users_confluence.sql. Note that the SQL doesn't limit itself to Internal directories yet. I haven't made a Groovy deactivation script based around it yetI haven't researched this much further, as instances I work with all have ScriptRunner available.
Conclusion
Using ScriptRunner, we have implemented a means for Jira to automatically deactivate inactive users, thus saving license slots. This is (to my knowledge, as of ) the only implementation that handles never-logged-in users. Users who require more flexibility can use the SQL-augmented approach.
...